Die Stellung des Menschen im geschichtlichen Prozess was originally published in Whereas the Athenians use the unpredictability of war to warn the Spartans 1. Stahl has, however, added two chapters to the original work, both on the Sicilian expedition the German edition ended with a consideration of the Melian Dialogue in Book 5 ; both have been published before, but they are right at home here and add to the value of the volume.
Only sometimes does the English become really strained. In general, Latti- more has been at pains to bring out the nuances of Greek words; this leads him to render 6xovai at 4. A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities.
One such strand is the question of whether "might makes right," which is the central argument of the Melian Dialogue. On the other side was the Delian Leaguean alliance led by Athens.
It is a measure of his suc- cess that readers will judge such conflicts to have been rare.
Taking advantage of a smaller country just because a bigger country can, seems to the Melians to be unfair and an injustice.
Yet this has not deterred scholars from attempting to find new ways to translate Thucydides into English; in fact, it only seems to have encouraged them. It was this latter predictive value to which Stahl particularly took exception. Even though Demosthenes later makes up for his loss by a victory, Thucydides concentrates on the tragedy of the events, on the way the pathos of the situation is inseparably joined to the events themselves: Oxford at the Clarendon Press.
The envoys came with an offer that, if the Melians submitted and became part of the Athenian empire, their people and their possessions would not be harmed.
Lattimore nowhere mentions the Melian financial contribution to Sparta. But all Thucydides himself says on this topic 5. The Melians raise the point during the dialogue that they are a neutral country and should be left alone. The second is the assessment of the Melians at the high total of fifteen talents in the Athenian reassessment decree ofML 69, Fornara They were afraid the Athenians, known for their rhetorical skills, might sway the people if allowed a public forum.
This struggle for hegemony by Athens and Sparta was felt most acutely by small, hitherto 'independent' states who were now being forced to take sides in the bipolar Greek world of the fifth century B. One cannot for example extrapolate remarks made in speeches and then elevate such remarks to the status of truths; instead, one must look at how remarks made in speeches actually play out in the events that follow, so that these events serve as a comment on the beliefs and opinions espoused in individual speeches.
Lattimore should have provided a note at 6. It was a pioneering and polemical work, written in opposition to a commonly-held belief prevalent in Germany especially but not exclusively, at the time that Thucydides had written his history as a manual for future politicians and generals which would enable them to understand exactly the wellsprings of human action, and, more than that, to predict confidently what would happen in the future.
The fleet that transported this army had 38 ships: Cambridgedoc. On the other hand, Mynott departs from the traditional practice of arranging the history into eight books in favour of the method used by Thucydides himself, of dividing the war into summers and winters.
Stahl looks in particular at the speeches of Nicias and Alcibiades that open Book 6. Chapter 6 turns to Book 3, where the darker side of the war now emerges. This dialogue is frequently cited by political scientists and diplomats as a classic case study in political realism.
It was this latter predictive value to which Stahl particularly took exception. The Athenians, having recognized the unequal position of the negotiators, make the right of the stronger the perimeter within which the debate will take place Melian Dialogue Analysis.
Freedom vs. Survival in The Melian Dialogue The Melian Dialogue, written by Thucydides, is an account of the confrontation between the people of Melos and the people of Athens. Melos was a small island off the southeastern coast of Greece that tried to remain independent and neutral during the Peloponnesian War.
An Analysis of Thucydides' Views on the Melian Dialogue The Melian Dialogue is a debate between Melian and Athenian representatives concerning the sovereignty of Melos.
The debate did not really occur-the arguments given by each side were of Thucydides own creation. Thus it is reasonable to assume that we can tease out Thucydides' own beliefs. Documentary Essay Examples. 16 total results. The Major Social Problems Around the World.
1, words. A Review of Michael Moore's Documentary Bowling for Columbine. 1, words. A Review of Thucydides Documentary "The Melian Dialogue" words.
1 page. A Review of Stupid White Men, a Book by Michael Moore. -- the Melian dialogue as stated earlier is a good example of the ideals of realism at work -- the strategic context for the Melian Dialogue was that at the time there was a turf war between Athens and Persia.
Review of Thucydides: Man's place in history, by H.-P.
Stahl. Bryn Mawr Classical Review, Review by John Marincola, The Florida State University. Hans-Peter Stahl's Thukydides: Die Stellung des Menschen im geschichtlichen Prozess was originally published in The Melian Dialogue is a debate between Melian and Athenian representatives concerning the sovereignty of Melos.
The debate did not really occur-the arguments given by each side were of Thucydides own creation.Download